Monday 23 April 2018

University Challenge 2017-18: Grand Final: St John's vs Merton

Evening all. What an odd day I've had: had very little sleep last night, and the strange feelings carried on at work this morning, though various other incidents there didn't help. My Mum suggested I might be distracted in anticipation of tonight; I dismissed that theory, but, as the evening drew on, I realised she was right. This has been, by far, the hardest grand final I've ever had to call, either on LAM or on here; these are two seriously good teams, and either would make very worthy champions. So, let's do this...

St John's College Cambridge got here undefeated, with victories over St Andrews, Corpus Christi of Cambridge, Ulster, Newcastle and Edinburgh, with only the game against the Tynesiders coming close to close. Hoping to reclaim the title for Cambridge were:
John-Clark Levin, from Ojai, California, studying Politics and International Studies   
Rosie McKeown, from Kingston-upon-Thames, studying French and German 
Captain: James Devine-Stoneman, from Southall in London, studying Superconducting Spintronics
Matt Hazell, from Ringwood in Hampshire, studying Veterinary Medicine

Merton College Oxford are also unbeaten thus far, having seen off King's of London, Oxford Brookes, Fitzwilliam of Cambridge, Edinburgh and Newcastle, all by very comfortable margins. Hoping to make it two in a row for Oxford for the first time in a while were:
Edward Thomas, from Kent, studying Ancient and Modern History  
Alexander Peplow, from Amersham in Buckinghamshire, studying Medieval Studies  
Captain: Leonie Woodland, from Cambridge, studying Physics  
Akira Wiberg, from Sweden and Japan, studying Molecular and Cellular Medicine

Off we set again then, and Mr Peplow was first out of the traps with 'Lord Reith', and his side set out their stall with two bonuses on 'effability'. Ms Woodland increased that advantage identifying 'dil' (the dog) as the herb featuring in the names of various defined words; another two bonuses, on the Shipping Forecast, and they were already looking in ominous form. The Merton captain took a second starter in a row, but just one bonus, a tough set on probabilities, followed this time. The first picture round, on word clouds of works of critical theory, allowed St John's to get off the mark; none of the bonuses, followed though, leaving them trailing 55-10.

Mr Levin gave St John's a second starter in a row, but, again, the Cambridge side drew a blank on the bonuses. A penalty from Merton then handed Ms McKeown a second starter of the night, and their first bonuses of the night, on the works of Anna Komnene, reduced their arrears further, and the show rattled on a brisk pace.

The music round, on recordings from the last night of the 2013 proms, conducted by Marin Alsop, went to St John's, with Merton dropping another five following a swerve on a replacement starter; only one bonus was taken, but the Cambridge side now had the lead, 55-45. And it increased when Ms McKeown took the next starter, and one bonus followed. St John's seemed to be starting to better the buzzer race, but weren't really making the most of the bonuses, thus keeping Merton in the game. Another penalty didn't help their cause though, giving Ms McKeown a fourth correct starter in a row; a full bonus set meant it was now their game to lose, you'd image. Mr Wiberg woke Merton up with a much needed starter, and they kept themselves well in the game with two bonuses on Chinese literature.

The second picture round, on 20th century artworks depicting motherhood, went to St John's, who took two bonuses, and now led 115-60. It was then their turn to drop five though, and Mr Wiberg did the honours for Merton; two bonuses, on the work of Willa Cather, meant they were still very much in this final heading into the home straight.

Ms McKeown then declared 'John Clare' however, giving her side more room to breath; just one bonus followed, but you fancied if they could keep up the buzzing that had got them this far, they'd likely be home and dry. Indeed, Ms McKeown took the next starter too, and you fancied, with such little time left, that was game over. Two bonuses seemed to confirm thus. Merton were going down fighting however, Ms Woodland taking 'lumen' for the next starter, and two bonuses on Boutros Boutros-Ghali deservedly took them into triple figures. And that was the gong: St John's won the game, and the series, 145-100!

The trophy was thus handed over to the winners by the composer Judith Weir, the current Master of the Queen's Music, before the traditional over-credits handshakes.

Not quite on a par with the drama of last year's final, but still a fine end to another fine series. Unlucky Merton, but no shame in coming second after doing so well in this series, thanks very much indeed for playing for us. Very very well done to St John's though, deserved champions, and a worthy addition to the champions list; very well done indeed!

The stats: Ms Woodland was Merton's best buzzer of the night with three to her name, though Mr Peplow was their best for the series as a whole, with 27; Ms McKeown, though, was the best buzzer both of the night, with seven, and the series, with a grand total of 32. (Full stats will be made available later in the week) On the bonuses, St John's converted 12 out of 27 (with one penalty), while Merton managed 11 out of 18 (with three penalties), so, as has quite often been the case this series, it was the buzzers that won the game.

And that's it for another series! Thanks very much to all readers for their ever useful correspondence! Stay tuned for my usual end of series look backs later in the week. And, of course, we still have work to do with Only Connect.

6 comments:

  1. I was screaming at the telly with those spectroscopy questions - paramagnetic! That said - 'not a technique I've used' by Devine Stoneman - Good answer, James, I hadn't heard of it either. I'll admit I enjoyed the match, but I felt very very bad for Merton, particularly the superb Woodland who looked crestfallen, like someone had deflated her. Chin up. I wonder if all that kerfuffle in their previous match with the music round knocked them for six.

    I'd have to rewatch but I think Hazell correctly told the Skipper to let the, let's be frank, super Rosie get a shot with the trophy (32 starters!). Well they should, it were her 'wot won it'.

    Well done to both teams, you were great, and I've got a pretty good idea at least some of you read this : )

    Thanks for all your work this season Jack, here's to next season!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow, Mckeown was on fire! Only just watched it, glad to see Cambridge win, although feel for Merton. I think it was just a slightly off day for a couple of them, Peplow a little too keen to get to the buzzer a couple of times?

    Never mind, great final, and well done to both teams for making it there.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Merton had 3 amazing contestants, St John's Cambridge had one super-amazing contestant. Still, they were by far the best teams this year and either one of them would have deserved to win!

    Side note, it said in Devine-Stoneman's interview for Medium that McKeown 'outperformed everybody by far' in the College trials - so why on Earth wasn't she captain?? I mean if somebody is marginally better in the College trials it's not that big a deal in the decision of who should be captain, but in this scenario it smells veeeery strongly of sexism.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Jack for the review.

    Final was certainly a tense and tight affair. Two outstanding teams that everyone thought were very closely matched. Merton seemed slightly ahead on the stats before the final (and even after the final Merton had a higher series aggregate), but clearly St. John’s are very deserving winners.

    Interesting to note that the best players on both sides in the Grand Final were women: unusual to see that in a UC match! This was much mentioned on twitter and led to the Telegraph’s headline “University Challenge: the 2018 Grand final was female-dominated and pleasingly highbrow in a dumbed-down world”.

    Jack said that it was won on the buzzer. Perhaps it could also have been viewed as lost on the buzzer as the negs (incorrect interruptions) were perhaps the key. Merton had 3 negs and St John’s one. Tom Hill (member of Emmanuel Cambridge’s 2016-17 UC team that got to the SFs and President of Cambridge University Quiz Society) said on twitter that “Pet hate: deliberately misleading #universitychallenge questions which bait people into giving wrong answers on things they clearly know about. The brilliant medievalist Alex Peplow victim to this tonight with the qs on Hubert Walter and Anselm”. I should note that Tom also later added “That said of course, take nothing away from a brilliant performance all round by St John's - exceptional team.” The first parts of UC questions can be rather misleading, and several such questions appeared in the final (as mentioned above by Tom and also e.g. the question about JJ Thomson).

    At a score of 70-45 to St. John’s a key point in the match was the neg by Alex Peplow, referred to by Tom Hill above, where Peplow gave the answer St. Anselm (which seemed at that point what the question was going to asking for) and just as Paxman was saying no, Peplow gave a second answer of “ontological argument” which can be clearly heard on the broadcast. Paxman carried on and completed the question for St. John’s and made it clear that he was asking for the name of an argument. Rosie McKeown buzzed and gave the answer “ontological”. Apparently, and not surprisingly, this caused the match to be stopped and the procedure queried as often when a correct answer is given second, the question is not passed over to the other team. However in this case McKeown said that she knew the answer anyway and the game continued. If Peplow’s interruption had got the correct answer (first rather than second) then Merton would no-doubt have picked up the rather straight-forward chemistry bonuses. At that point it would have been 70-70. After that (when the actual score was 95-40 in St. John’s favour), Merton added 60 more points and St. John’s 50. I’ve mentioned this just to show how close the match actually was, and on what small margins these things are decided.

    Aethelstan mentioned the possible impact regarding the Copland kerfuffle in the second semi-final (due to Paxman’s error in giving away the answer to the third music bonus). Since the SFs are recorded in the morning and the final is recorded in the afternoon just after lunch, that the Merton vs Newcastle SF was filmed second and that there was a very long 30-40 min delay part way through, meant that St. John’s would have had much more time after their SF to recover for the final than Merton. Of course, it can’t be known if this would have made a difference to the final outcome but it is interesting that Aethelstan implied that it might have done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ... and finally, while UC may be over for another year, this coming weekend will see the recording of the QFs/SFs/Final of the 2018-19 programme. One impact of this long gap between recording and broadcast is that the winners aren’t able to keep the trophy after it is presented. Rather it goes to the previous years winners to display! The really eagle-eyed may have noticed that the trophy presented in the 2017-18 final just broadcast had Peterhouse, Cambridge as the most recent winner (this is just visible in one close-up shot). After the show it would have gone off to have Balliol Oxford engraved on it and then to be displayed in Balliol. By now it should have come back to the producers to be presented to the 2018-19 winners before it can then be sent off to St. John’s Cambridge.

      Delete
    2. I didn't know about the ontological thing, did you get to the recording? I have learnt something new today about the trophy as well, thank you! There was some reference by de Bock on twitter of their being some stop/query in his Merton match, I hadn't realised it was that common.

      If readers are interested, there is an article focussing on Ms. McKeown in the Torygraph, not paywalled but registration required. I was a bit downcast to see some of the twitter trolls got to her after the first match, but casting an eye over twitter reveals a lot of love, so I hope she is enjoying the adulation.. A colleague of mine related that her teenage daughter was inspired by Rosie. Her team-mate Levin quite publically humiliated a number of trolls in what I thought was an effective, non-confrontational way, but it doesn't suit everyone, and I have been in a similar position, albeit with the benefit of much life experience under belt.

      I thought the Copland business might have disturbed Merton by the look of their body language, Woodland and Peplow looked very unnerved to my eye. The account of the Copland affair did not sound good and would have knocked me!!

      Delete