Playing tonight were Wadham College
Oxford and Bristol University.
Wadham College Oxford was founded
in 1610, and former students include the soon-to-be-retiring Archbishop of
Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams, Christopher Wren, Michael Foot and, er, my Uncle
John! The college last entered the show in 2006-07, where they trounced
Robinson College Cambridge and Royal Holloway London, before losing a close
match to eventual runners-up Manchester. Tonight's quartet, one of the youngest
this series apparantly, were:
Alisatir Smout, from Harpenden
in Hertfordshire, studying PPE
Jonathan Hall, from Sheffield,
studying Politics
Captain: Jonathan Stanhope, from
Durha, studying History and Politics
Oliver Forrest, from London,
studying English
Bristol is somewhat newer, having been first established in the 1870s.
Alumni include Lucas and Walliums of Little Britain fame, and the author David
Nicholls (if you haven’t read Starter for Ten yet, do; it’s a seriously good
book). The university last appeared on the show two years ago, where they
scraped a win against St Andrews in the first round, and then trounced Newnham
College Cambridge in the second; then, despite going into both their
quarter-final matches as favourites, they lost both to Queens’ College
Cambridge, and eventual runners-up York respectively. Playing tonight were:
James Xiao, from Hampsire,
studying Chemistry
Andy Suttie, from Kelso in the
Borders, studying the History and
Philosophy of Science
Captain: Will Brady, from
Hertford, studying Maths
Madeline Fforde, from Wiltshire,
studying Classics and Ancient History
Bristol got off to the stronger start on the buzzers, but their poor
showing on the bonuses meant that they could never draw out as big a lead as
perhaps they could have. Wadham began to slowly make their way back into the
match, but they too were struggling on the bonuses, notably, in the music
round, on operas where the title character was called ‘Don’. Am I the only one
who guessed that ‘Don Carlos would be the final one, before the first one was
played?
Throughout the second half of the match, the sides generally swapped
starters and, though Wadham came within touching distance a few times, they
couldn’t overtake Bristol. Though both sides got starters, not very many
bonuses followed suite. In the end, Bristol emerged narrow winners by 120-105.
It wasn’t until I was typing up my usual short summary on the forum that I
realised that Bristol’s score is the lowest winning score achieved under Mr
Paxo’s tenure.
Andy Suttie’s four starters was Bristol’s best tally; the side answered
10 bonuses correctly out of a possible 27, with four incorrect interruptions.
Wadham split the starters evenly, with all four players getting two each; the
side only answered 6 bonuses out of 24, with one penalty.
Not a classic match by any means; with all due respect, neither side
really got into gear. It was Bristol’s slightly better showing on the buzzers
that won them the match, as neither side really impressed on the bonuses.
Further progress for the Avonsiders looks unlikely, unless they improve on the
bonuses next time, which is always a possibility.
Next week’s match: Strathclyde vs Durham
No Jack, I did exactly the same thing with Don carlos. FUnnily enough I knew Don Giovanni, but not the others, so I kept answering Don Carlos , knowing it would definitely be ONE of them. Don Quixote didn't occur to me.
ReplyDeleteThis wasn't a great match by any stretch of the imagination. You can only judge so much from one match, but I would be worried for this Bristol team if they came up against one of the best sides , who also happened to be good on the buzzer, in the next round. Too many gap areas in knowledge there for my liking - and they didn't do brilliantly with the maths and science either, and you have to have at least one person on your team who can take care of those for you, prefereably two.