Good evening again my friends, and welcome back to another Quizzy Monday! Coming up tonight, another hotly anticipated OC match-up, Mastermind enters the third fifth of its first round, and Brain of Britain concludes its heats. Firstly, though, UC, and apologies for those who were waiting for a first round review; I'm not doing one this year, as I'd probably just be repeating what I've said many times before now. If you want one, I recommend the latest Weaver's Week. On the plus side, I've decided to carry on with full line-up from now on, for old time's sake. Anyway, on with the show, and the first repechage play-off.
U.C.L. rejoin us as the highest scoring first round runners-up, having narrowly lost a very good match against Open 190-175 on the final starter of the game. They were unchanged from that contest:
Calum Jack, from Sutton in Surrey, studying Science Communication
Josh Mandel, from North London, studying US History and Politics
Captain: Olivia Holtermann Entwistle, from London, studying Human Geography
Sanjay Prabhakar, from London, studying Science Education
St Andrews were last with us more recently, losing 200-145 to Cardiff, a match that, as the chairman rightly pointed out, was closer than that score suggests. They were also the same four as before:
Diane Buffet-Mogel, from Princeton, New Jersey, studying Classics and Philosophy
George Capell, from Broughton Hackett in Worcestershire, studying Economics
Captain: Freddie Skerrett, from Chislehurst in Kent, studying History
Tom Rosas, from Richmond-upon-Thames (originally Recife in Brazil), studying Physics
The sides were well matched at first, sharing the first starters and faring pretty similarly on the bonuses too. After the first picture round, St Andrews led 45-40. Kudos to AR, by the way, who was clearly unwell, but carried on well regardless; much like when William G Stewart hosted nearly two weeks' worth of Fifteen-to-One with a bad throat. U.C.L. pulled away a bit, but St Andrews kept themselves in the game with a starter and full house. After the music round, U.C.L. led 110-60.
U.C.L. hit their form in the third phase, however, getting a run of starters and a solid haul of bonuses and, all of a sudden, they'd pulled into a three figure lead. After the second picture round, they led 185-75. Another starter and pair of bonuses took the Londoners past 200 and the game was now well and truly over. St Andrews did manage a late rally to deservedly reach three figures, but had been well beaten this time. At the gong, U.C.L. won 215-105.
A good contest that, despite ultimately finishing in a walkover. Well done U.C.L., an impressive performance that stands them in good stead for the second round; best of luck in it! Hard lines to St Andrews, but they definitely didn't disgrace themselves, a good effort; thanks for playing!
The stats: Mr Mandel was, again, the best buzzer of the night with EIGHT(!) starters, while Ms Buffet-Mogel and Mr Skerrett were joint best for St Andrews with two each. On the bonuses, U.C.L. managed an impressive 21 out of 31 and St Andrews an also very good 13 out of 18 (with four penalties).
Next week's match: Durham vs SOAS in the second play-off
Only Connect continued its
qualification matches with a hotly anticipated match-up between Too Many
Cookes, who defeated the very good Pipe-Dreamers in their first match, and the
Bloomsbury Group, who, of course, won that utterly bonkers contest against the
Tea-Totallers.
My Dad and I only claim one point
in the first round, on the ‘parents of Maggies’ question; the Bloomers led 3-2
at the end of that round. The second round gave us the first music sequence of
the series, which the Cookes scored two on; later in the round, VCM was
probably just about right to accept a borderline answer of ‘3: Britain’ for a sequence
of islands with ascending numbers of nations on them. I got the model answer of
‘3: Borneo’ on that one for two points. After that, the teams were tied on
7-all.
The Cookes went first on the
Walls, and very quickly pulled out a perfect round for a full ten. The Bloomers
took a bit longer, but did so as well, so as you were, 17-17 going into Missing
Vowels. It was a close round, with VCM atoning for her leniency earlier by
letting the Bloomers off with a slight pause during answering, and, indeed, the
teams again still couldn’t be separated; a second 21-each tie-breaker in a row!
Ms Sheriff won the tie-breaker to send her team through; well done them, and
best of luck to the Cookes in their next match!
Next week’s match: Introverts vs
Crunchers
Mastermind was opened by Sam
Petherby, answering on the Two Ronnies TV series; sadly, the questions, many of
which were about specific details of specific sketches, didn’t fall for her,
and she ended the round with only 3 points. Ian Grieve was next into the chair,
answering on Richard Feynman; he, in contrast, got all his questions right,
finishing with a very strong 11 points.
Dimitri Sameresinghe was next up,
answering on the Toronto Blue Jays baseball team; he went nearly down the
middle of the two previous scores, with a respectable round of 8. Finally, Richard
Kimber, part of the Oxford Brookes team on UC a few series back, answered on
the rather broad subject of badgers; despite there, sadly, being no mention of
the mashed potato loving badger of the classic 90s kids show, he produced another
top round, and went one better than Ian with 12, going into the lead.
Sam thus returned to the chair
first already pretty much out of the running; she gave it a go, but, again,
just couldn’t get a run of questions together. Her final total was 9. Dimitri was
next, and his GK round was a slow burner, starting a bit slowly, then he got a
good run going towards the end, and finished with a very decent total of 20. As
we’ve seen before, that’s not insurmountable, though you suspected at least one
of Ian and Richard would probably beat it.
Indeed, Ian did so in very short
order, and went on to produce one of the best performances of the series so
far; a superb 17 gave him a fantastic final total of 28, and definitely left
Richard with his work cut out to beat him. He gave it a good go, but a few
early wrong answers left him a bit too off the pace, and two subsequent passes
pretty much ended his challenge. He still scored a decent 10 points, giving him
a good final score of 22, but that left Ian the clear winner! Well done him,
and thanks to the other for taking part.
Brain of Britain’s final heat was
won by Tim Hall, captain of the Detectives from Series 13 of OC, who led
throughout and ended up comfortable enough winner with 15 points, five ahead of
second placed Richard Edwards (unsure if same Richard Edwards as the son of
David, formerly of UC, OC and WWTBAM) with 10. Adam Vernone and Catherine
McManus also competed, finishing with 6 and 5 respectively.
So, we now have our 12 definite
semi-finalists, and we already knew that Caroline Latham, Helen Lippell and
Andrew Fisher would be three of the four highest scoring non-winners. We end
with a three-way tie for the fourth and final place between Andrew Fanko, Diane
Hallagan and Alan Eeles; Russell D subsequently revealed at the end of the show
that, as I theorised, the three would take part in an off-screen play-off to
decide who went through. If you don’t want to know who won that play-off, my
advice is don’t look at next week’s show’s page on the BBC website!
And that's it for another week! Thanks, as ever, for reading this new blog series, which, I must say, I am actually enjoying writing a bit more than my old UC focussed blogs, and which will continue again next week, same time same place; so, see you then.